Useful site is about custom coursework writing help

Dissertation proposal example qualitative content

Jun 3, 2018

The second edition of The Qualitative Dissertation is a major revision of the book with the addition of new material, substantial reorganization of information, and the incorporation of new features.

The concept of "cycles of deliberation" served as the organizing principle of the first edition. While the recursive nature of interpretive inquiry remains an important message of the book, greater emphasis has been given to the concept of "self as instrument of inquiry" and the centrality of constructing texts in interpretive inquiry. Information has been added to clarify the nature of knowledge claims generated through interpretive studies. Additionally, more emphasis is placed on encouraging doctoral students to relate concepts of qualitative research to their own experience, beliefs, talents, and sensibilities. This has led to several new features in individual chapters as well as some reorganization of the book.

The contents of the book have been organized into four sections. The first three highlight phases of the dissertation journey—facing the journey, preparing for the journey, and living through the journey. Case Examples of interpretive dissertations have been removed from individual chapters and consolidated into a fourth section for easier reference. A key to the Case Examples is also included on the inside of the front cover. Many chapters have been given new titles to clarify the conceptual content being presented. In addition, the content of the book has been divided into shorter chapters to make complex concepts more accessible.

New features within chapters include a preliminary listing of key concepts to be discussed. The reference list has been updated and sidebars have been added in many chapters to help readers locate references of relevance to particular topics. A key feature is the addition of "Reflective Interludes" which prompt readers to think carefully about their own assumptions about, conceptions of, and capacities for interpretive dissertation research. Textboxes highlighting criteria for judging the merits of interpretive dissertations have been added. The Index has been greatly expanded and refined.

Content Analysis Home

Content analysis is one of the classical procedures for analysing textual material, no matter where this content comes from – ranging from interview data, videos to media products. It analyses communication matter in various formats. The communication might be between individuals, groups or any form of public communication. It is one of the main techniques used when applying qualitative analysis. Dissertation India has a team of experienced professionals, who have successfully conducted qualitative research using content analysis method for numerous PhD Dissertations and theses. Researchers in the field of social science vouch by our services in this field.

Our consultation on content analysis in a qualitative research is thorough and includes coding as well. As such, if you need support in coding or writing the results and discussion chapter, you have reached the right place. We also offer use of Nvivo for conducting qualitative research, however researcher must have previous experience in the field of qualitative research to be able to understand the workings and suggest modifications.

The first step in content analysis is to define the material, to select interviews or those parts that are relevant for answering the research question. The next step is to analyse the situation of data collection, which includes how the material was generated, who was involved and who was present in the interview situation. In the third phase, the collected material and responses are characterised, which may include details on how the content was documented. One of the critical features is the use of categories, which are mostly obtained from theoretical models. At the fourth stage, we define the direction of analysis of the chosen texts and material. This step also outlines what the researcher intends to interpret from the data.

In summarising content analysis, the material is paraphrased, which means that less relevant passages and paraphrases with repeated meaning are omitted and similar paraphrases are put together. The researcher must also be cautious to note any differences between the obvious and implied meaning of the communication being studied. The literal or quantitative meaning must be differentiated from the inferred or qualitative meaning. To know more about the rules of content analysis, do get in touch with us.

Previous researchers advise that the "research question of analysis must be clearly defined in advance, must be theoretically linked to earlier research on the issue and generally has to be differentiated in sub-questions" (Marying 2000, 2004). Hence, we would first examine your topic for the dissertation, the statistics you have collected and the previous work done on the subject. We use the content analysis technique for making inferences about the antecedents, impact and characteristics of a communication. Be assured that, whatever the type of information you collect and bring to us, we would interpret in the best possible manner and deliver accurate results.



1.1 Title

How the public viewed the role of credit rating agencies in the financial crisis?

1.2 Background

Since the 1990’s,

the financial crisis has become a regular occurrence around the world. The

current crisis started in the United States in 2007 on the subprime segment of the US housing

market, after which it took on seismic proportions. There is a general agreement that the

Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) are one of the primary contributors to the current financial

crisis. The agencies miscalculated the risks that are correlated with the structured credit

 products and did not adjust their ratings in accordance with the depreciating market. CRA’s

were accused of disregards of conflicts of interests, flaws in rating methodologies, and

insufficient consideration of macroeconomic development as a factor when giving ratings

(Ernest and Young, 2012).


were first criticised as a result of the debt crisis, which started in 1997. However,

there was no rush amongst the polity to take any legislative action. In fact, the

Code of 

Conduct Fundamentals for Credit Rating Agencies,

was published by the


Organization of Securities Commissions

(IOSCO) in 2004, clearly indicated that they

 preferred a self-regulatory approach. This approach seemed to be quite successful since all

the big

CRA’s acceded to the code.

But, the current financial crisis, which started in 2007 in

the US, exploded into phenomenal global proportions that there has been a frenzied debate

about the rating methodologies, the credit rating agencies, and the measures that need to be

introduced to minimize the repetition of previous mistakes.

The European Commission has now accepted a regulation, which authorizes the European

Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to oversee the credit rating agencies and fine them

if they breach European Union (EU) legislation. The Credit Rating Agency Regulation

consists of a full list of guidelines including conflicts of interest, barriers to supervisory

authorities, or even non-disclosure of certain information that if broken by the rating agencies

will result in fines (Barroso, 2012).

May you live every day of your life. Jonathan Swift

Previous: Persuasive speech question of fact examples
Next post: Sustainable use of land resources essay writer